If you check the twitter page of UK company Genomics England, a happy picture emerges of an ambitious company building the latest medical knowledge base. Dig a bit deeper and you find that Genomics England is just an arm of UK government (“Genomics England was established in July 2013 as a company 100% owned [...]
Posted on 26 August 2014 | 6:54 am
Readers may recall our blog post from last year -
Tragedy of the Day: PNAS Got Duped by Positivity Lady !!
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot – Arianna Huffington Embraces PNAS-published Junk Science of Positivity !!!
UC Berkeley, Lior Pachter’s University, Offers MOOC Course on ‘Science’ of Positivity
That blog post led to a formal paper that [...]
Posted on 25 August 2014 | 2:00 pm
Here is a riddle for our readers. Let us say you open the newspaper and read about the latest and greatest new study.
“Gene expression Study shows those enjoying subtle humor are healthier than those who do not”
“Gene expression Study shows Republican-type people are smarter than Democrat-type people”
“Gene expression study in mice [...]
Posted on 25 August 2014 | 9:26 am
We came across this BMC Genomics paper in twitter, but did not get time to read yet. Hopefully, the readers will find it useful.
Background Gene expression analysis by RNA sequencing is now widely used in a number of applications surveying the whole transcriptomes of cells and tissues. The recent introduction of ribosomal RNA [...]
Posted on 12 August 2014 | 9:49 am
In the past, we talked about ‘short read noise’, which is the noise introduced by clean short reads due to being short. Readers may take at these two of our earlier commentaries for details.
End of Short-Read Era? – (Part I)
End of Short-Read Era? – (Part II)
An excellent biorxiv paper analyzing RNA-seq assemblies [...]
Posted on 16 July 2014 | 3:14 am
Richard Smith-Una, whose work was covered in our blog, releases a new quality assessment program (transrate) that we surely like to check out.
Transcriptome assembly is hard. The algorithms are complex, the data are messy, and it’s often not clear how to determine whether an assembly is suitable for answering a biological question.
Posted on 8 July 2014 | 7:53 am
Posted on 26 August 2014 | 12:02 pm
Posted on 13 August 2014 | 7:06 am
Posted on 2 August 2014 | 9:43 am
Posted on 12 June 2014 | 3:43 am
Posted on 6 May 2014 | 11:28 am
Posted on 3 May 2014 | 7:21 am
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology is based on cutting DNA into small fragments, and their massive parallel sequencing. The multiple overlapping segments termed “reads” are assembled into a contiguous sequence. To reduce sequencing errors, every genome region should be sequenced several dozen times. This sequencing approach is based on the assumption that genomic DNA [...]
Posted on 10 June 2014 | 6:08 am
We had been pondering about those cryptic terms and found by asking some people around that the P stands for polymerase and C stands for chemistry. Therefore, P4-C2 means polymerase of fourth generation and chemistry of second generation.
That got us curious about what the actual DNA polymerase sequences are for 2nd, 3rd or [...]
Posted on 4 April 2014 | 4:58 am
Changing genome in plants used to be incredibly difficult, but not any more. Here is an excellent review -
Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system
Targeted genome engineering (also known as genome editing) has emerged as an alternative to classical plant breeding and transgenic (GMO) [...]
Posted on 31 March 2014 | 9:58 pm
Posted on 28 July 2014 | 11:47 pm
Posted on 7 July 2014 | 1:23 pm
Posted on 7 July 2014 | 1:13 pm
Posted on 12 June 2014 | 3:48 am
Posted on 7 May 2014 | 7:48 pm
Posted on 7 May 2014 | 7:38 pm
Posted on 21 August 2014 | 5:21 pm
Posted on 16 August 2014 | 6:34 pm
Posted on 8 July 2014 | 10:55 am
Posted on 26 August 2014 | 8:54 am
Posted on 26 August 2014 | 8:39 am
Posted on 11 August 2014 | 5:15 pm
Posted on 26 August 2014 | 10:11 am
Posted on 26 August 2014 | 7:37 am
Posted on 25 August 2014 | 7:44 pm